@watson2019lesbackcity
in the conclusion the authors argue ‘life on the move ... produces new forms of social experience and structures of feeling’ (p. 155). The participant data reveals an even richer emotional geography than Back and Sinha conceptually explore.
Participants’ voices burst with fear, anxiety, joy, frustration, happiness, pain, bravery, tiredness, contempt and concern. The relationships between this emotionality and migration mobilities is something that sociologists of emotions and affect may use Migrant City to expand and build upon.
There were many times while reading the participants’ experiences I leant back in my chair and swore – the text Christian received as he boarded a plane leaving the UK (p. 11), Nana’s photograph of the bus captioned ‘route to work or deportation’ (p. 28), the Home Office using Twitter to share photos of people being arrested with the hashtag #immigra- tionoffenders (p. 29), Zee Zee’s defiance while suffering beatings (p. 116), and Jessielyn’s tattoo (p. 157). The experiences captured in this ethnography shine a sociological light on what it means to live with/in Britain’s postcolonial melancholia.
Ashleigh Watson
Griffith University